Explorations into Nahua and Mayan Philosophy of Mind
Introduction
This blueprint aims at exploring the landscape of philosophical concepts and ideas present in ancient Nahua and Mayan thought. By Nahua thought we mean the intellectual legacy of the Nahuatl speaking people who inhabited the Mexican Central Plateau from roughly the fourteenth century until the first years of the colonial Mexico. Throughout the blueprint, we refer at times to this intellectual tradition as pertaining to the Aztecs, the Mexicas, or the Nahuas depending on the group of people to which the selected reading refers. By Mayan thought we mean, in turn, the legacy of the people who has inhabited the Maya region of Southern Mexico and a great part of Central America roughly from the Classical period to the eighteenth century. The Mesoamerican philosophical landscape is rich, but difficult to navigate due to important methodological challenges such as the scarcity of sources. Great progress has already been made, however, in the understanding of philosophical concerns by key scholarly figures. Based on their work, this blueprint explores philosophical concerns that we might associate now with philosophy of mind: the human soul, the relation between the soul and body, perception and the senses, time experience, and personhood. Our hope is that this blueprint contributes to displaying the richness of the Mesoamerican philosophical landscape.
The blueprint is divided into three sections, each composed of three proposed sessions. It begins with an introductory section that provides historical and cultural background, followed by two thematic sections: one that focuses on Nahuatl thought, and one that focuses on Mayan thought. To put together the blueprint, the selected readings range from philosophical, historical and anthropological texts to literature. In sections II and III, we have included primary sources that will help illustrate the philosophical ideas discussed in the selected readings. In these sections we have specified how the different readings fit together. When necessary, we have provided a bit of context in the introductory comments guiding the session.
Contents
- Can you think of a particular theory within the Western philosophical canon whose relevance can be only properly understood if we take into account the historical context in which it was developed? (e.g., Hobbes’ account of political authority and the English Civil War).
- If there never was a Mayan empire or any particular society that called itself “the Mayas”, what do we mean when we speak about the “Maya civilization”?
- Which are the main sources of Mayan mythology? Regarding content and format, how do these compare to canonical sources of Greek mythology (Hesiod’s Theogony, or Homer’s Iliad and Odyssey)?
- What is the place of Teotihuacan in the Aztec world view?
- If the defeat of the Aztec empire was only possible with the collaboration of both native peoples and Spaniards, in what way can we conceive the victory of the latter as a colonialist conquest?
- Can you think of a particular theory within the Western philosophical canon whose relevance can be only properly understood if we take into account the historical context in which it was developed? (e.g., Hobbes’ account of political authority and the English Civil War).
- If there never was a Mayan empire or any particular society that called itself “the Mayas”, what do we mean when we speak about the “Maya civilization”?
- Which are the main sources of Mayan mythology? Regarding content and format, how do these compare to canonical sources of Greek mythology (Hesiod’s Theogony, or Homer’s Iliad and Odyssey)?
- What is the place of Teotihuacan in the Aztec world view?
- If the defeat of the Aztec empire was only possible with the collaboration of both native peoples and Spaniards, in what way can we conceive the victory of the latter as a colonialist conquest?
- What is the difference between “truth-seeking” philosophy and “path-seeking” philosophy?
- If not truth, what is the foundation of Mexica’s “path-seeking” philosophy?
- Which are the main responsibilities of the Mexica philosopher?
- What is the relationship between human beings and deities (i.e., Creator Beings) in Mexica philosophy/religion?
- In which sense are Mexica ethics non-anthropocentric?
- Can you describe the Mexica notion of “personhood”?
- What is the difference between “truth-seeking” philosophy and “path-seeking” philosophy?
- If not truth, what is the foundation of Mexica’s “path-seeking” philosophy?
- Which are the main responsibilities of the Mexica philosopher?
- What is the relationship between human beings and deities (i.e., Creator Beings) in Mexica philosophy/religion?
- In which sense are Mexica ethics non-anthropocentric?
- Can you describe the Mexica notion of “personhood”?
- Why is it the case that Ancient Mayan Philosophy is not part of Latin American Philosophy?
- Can you mention some of the challenges faced by scholars trying to reconstruct the history of Mayan Thought?
- Why does the author use some concepts of Chinese philosophy to understand similar Mayan philosophical concepts?
- Explain the Aztec concept of “truth” and how it compares to its Mayan counterpart.
- How does the fact that both Mayan people and languages are still around affect the reconstruction of Mayan classical philosophy?
- Why is it the case that Ancient Mayan Philosophy is not part of Latin American Philosophy?
- Can you mention some of the challenges faced by scholars trying to reconstruct the history of Mayan Thought?
- Why does the author use some concepts of Chinese philosophy to understand similar Mayan philosophical concepts?
- Explain the Aztec concept of “truth” and how it compares to its Mayan counterpart.
- How does the fact that both Mayan people and languages are still around affect the reconstruction of Mayan classical philosophy?
- In what sense are human beings in a precarious situation on earth?
León-Portilla introduces the narration of Quetzalcóatl’s trip to Mictlan (the underworld) that relates to the origin of human beings, what is the moral of this narration regarding the human nature? - What is the Nahuatl understanding of “face” (ix-tli) and its development?
- What is the Nahuatl understanding of “heart” (yollotl) and what could it mean to say that it is dynamic?
- How did Nahuatl thought made compatible the idea that human beings have a certain predetermined fate and destiny with the idea that they can have some control over it?
- What is the tlamatimine or sage’s role in the development of human beings and in their understanding of the true of human being’s origin and nature?
- How is the idea that the value of life on earth is limited expressed in the Cantares “Beginning of the songs” and “A song of green places…”?
- Read the cantar “Flower song” and think: what is the heart’s desire and why cannot it be found on earth?
- In what sense are human beings in a precarious situation on earth?
León-Portilla introduces the narration of Quetzalcóatl’s trip to Mictlan (the underworld) that relates to the origin of human beings, what is the moral of this narration regarding the human nature? - What is the Nahuatl understanding of “face” (ix-tli) and its development?
- What is the Nahuatl understanding of “heart” (yollotl) and what could it mean to say that it is dynamic?
- How did Nahuatl thought made compatible the idea that human beings have a certain predetermined fate and destiny with the idea that they can have some control over it?
- What is the tlamatimine or sage’s role in the development of human beings and in their understanding of the true of human being’s origin and nature?
- How is the idea that the value of life on earth is limited expressed in the Cantares “Beginning of the songs” and “A song of green places…”?
- Read the cantar “Flower song” and think: what is the heart’s desire and why cannot it be found on earth?
- What are the substances that compose the body?
- How does López Austin divide the different types of souls?
- What is the relation between the body and the substances related to the soul? In what sense are they dynamic?
- How does the question about the origin of human beings and that about the origin of tonalli relate to each other?
- What are the main features and functions of teyolía? What its function? In what sense is teyolía collective? Considering López Austin’s characterization of death, what’s the relation between teyolía and its human host?
- What are the features of tonalli? How do you make sense of the idea that one must care for their tonalli?
- What are the features and functions of ihíyotl?
- Why are the passages related to death and the transformation of a person into a bird taken in relation to the nature of the heart?
- To which organs does the passage in page 25 of book 6 of the Florentine Codex associate the knowledge of the individual?
- How is the pure life characterized in page 114 of book 6 of the Florentine Codex?
- What are the substances that compose the body?
- How does López Austin divide the different types of souls?
- What is the relation between the body and the substances related to the soul? In what sense are they dynamic?
- How does the question about the origin of human beings and that about the origin of tonalli relate to each other?
- What are the main features and functions of teyolía? What its function? In what sense is teyolía collective? Considering López Austin’s characterization of death, what’s the relation between teyolía and its human host?
- What are the features of tonalli? How do you make sense of the idea that one must care for their tonalli?
- What are the features and functions of ihíyotl?
- Why are the passages related to death and the transformation of a person into a bird taken in relation to the nature of the heart?
- To which organs does the passage in page 25 of book 6 of the Florentine Codex associate the knowledge of the individual?
- How is the pure life characterized in page 114 of book 6 of the Florentine Codex?
- What are the methodological challenges faced by sensorial studies?
In what sense is sight active? How does the Nahua view of sight compare to that of Classical antiquity? - How would you articulate the features that make sound relevant?
What are the features of smell? What is the connection between the sense or smell and synesthetic experiences? - What does Newman mean by ‘sensorial assemblages’? Why is it methodologically relevant for sensorial studies?
- Why is it relevant to consider that Mesoamerican cultures do not conceive of personhood as bounded to an individual body to study perception?
- What is the relation, in Aztec culture, between orality and literacy? Based on this, what is the role of Aztec pictographic writing system?
How is the discourse of the Mapa mostly expressed? - How does the Mapa achieve communicating non-propositional meaning?
- In light of López-Austin’s view of Nahuatl perception and the Houston & Taube’s idea that communication is multi-modal, how would you articulate the expressive potential of Nahuatl pictographic communication?
- What are the methodological challenges faced by sensorial studies?
In what sense is sight active? How does the Nahua view of sight compare to that of Classical antiquity? - How would you articulate the features that make sound relevant?
What are the features of smell? What is the connection between the sense or smell and synesthetic experiences? - What does Newman mean by ‘sensorial assemblages’? Why is it methodologically relevant for sensorial studies?
- Why is it relevant to consider that Mesoamerican cultures do not conceive of personhood as bounded to an individual body to study perception?
- What is the relation, in Aztec culture, between orality and literacy? Based on this, what is the role of Aztec pictographic writing system?
How is the discourse of the Mapa mostly expressed? - How does the Mapa achieve communicating non-propositional meaning?
- In light of López-Austin’s view of Nahuatl perception and the Houston & Taube’s idea that communication is multi-modal, how would you articulate the expressive potential of Nahuatl pictographic communication?
- Think of the different ways in which human creation failed, what was missing at each attempt?
- What were the features of human beings when they were finally successfully made? What capacities did they have?
- How were human beings changed and why?
- What was the aim of the gods in creating humanity?
- In what sense can it be said that objects have a sacred quality? And what role can they fulfil in the relation between human and gods?
- What are the features of each of the notions of the soul discussed by Freidel, Schele & Parker?
- Who is K’awil and in what other ways is the term k’awil (or similar) used?
- What is the relation between k’awil and the vital force? How does this relate to sacrifices?
- How would you articulate the Mayan view of the relation between the soul, understood as a vital force, and the body?
- Think of the different ways in which human creation failed, what was missing at each attempt?
- What were the features of human beings when they were finally successfully made? What capacities did they have?
- How were human beings changed and why?
- What was the aim of the gods in creating humanity?
- In what sense can it be said that objects have a sacred quality? And what role can they fulfil in the relation between human and gods?
- What are the features of each of the notions of the soul discussed by Freidel, Schele & Parker?
- Who is K’awil and in what other ways is the term k’awil (or similar) used?
- What is the relation between k’awil and the vital force? How does this relate to sacrifices?
- How would you articulate the Mayan view of the relation between the soul, understood as a vital force, and the body?
- Why would it be unintuitive for the Mayans to accept a view of the self as an entity distinct from its community and that retains its identity over time?
- What is the Mayan understanding of an entity that contains another entity? What is the connection between this idea and the relevance of performance, ritual, and repetition in Mayan thought?
- In what sense did material artifacts (e.g. stelae and monuments) contained the essence of the person they memorialized?
- What is the way of an individual? How is it different from their ch’ul? In what sense is way collective?
- How can someone’s essence extend beyond the boundaries of their body?
- What is, according to McLeod substitution (k’ex)? How is this exemplified in sacrifices? What does this tell us about individual and collective essences?
- What is the relation between the self (baah) and the body?
How does the Mayan view of the soul compare to that of the Nahuas? In what sense is the notion of baah similar to that of tonalli, and that of ch’ul to that of teyolia? - Why would it be unintuitive for the Mayans to accept a view of the self as an entity distinct from its community and that retains its identity over time?
- What is the Mayan understanding of an entity that contains another entity? What is the connection between this idea and the relevance of performance, ritual, and repetition in Mayan thought?
- In what sense did material artifacts (e.g. stelae and monuments) contained the essence of the person they memorialized?
- What is the way of an individual? How is it different from their ch’ul? In what sense is way collective?
- How can someone’s essence extend beyond the boundaries of their body?
- What is, according to McLeod substitution (k’ex)? How is this exemplified in sacrifices? What does this tell us about individual and collective essences?
- What is the relation between the self (baah) and the body?
How does the Mayan view of the soul compare to that of the Nahuas? In what sense is the notion of baah similar to that of tonalli, and that of ch’ul to that of teyolia? - Based on Edmonson’s account of the Mayan view of history, why and how can priests predict the fate of a katun?
- What was the disagreement between the Itza and the Xiu about?
- What was the relation between katun cycles and ruling rights?
- In what sense can the Mayan conception of time be thought of as a mechanical clock?
- According to Eberl reconstruction of Husserl’s position, what are retentions and protentions? What is the difference between reproduction and retention? Based on these notions, how would you articulate the idea that time is a feature of perceptual experience?
- How do the inscriptions in Copan Altar Q. and Zoomorph P. illustrate the Husserlian view of the experience of time? In what sense do each of these narrations create a different cognitive image of the narrated events?
- How does Eberl articulate the notion of tz’ak or time-ordering?
- In what sense do tz’ak counts allow rulers to stake a future claim?
- How does the ordering of time relate to the manipulation of space?
- How do Mayan rulers “embody time”?
- Based on Edmonson’s account of the Mayan view of history, why and how can priests predict the fate of a katun?
- What was the disagreement between the Itza and the Xiu about?
- What was the relation between katun cycles and ruling rights?
- In what sense can the Mayan conception of time be thought of as a mechanical clock?
- According to Eberl reconstruction of Husserl’s position, what are retentions and protentions? What is the difference between reproduction and retention? Based on these notions, how would you articulate the idea that time is a feature of perceptual experience?
- How do the inscriptions in Copan Altar Q. and Zoomorph P. illustrate the Husserlian view of the experience of time? In what sense do each of these narrations create a different cognitive image of the narrated events?
- How does Eberl articulate the notion of tz’ak or time-ordering?
- In what sense do tz’ak counts allow rulers to stake a future claim?
- How does the ordering of time relate to the manipulation of space?
- How do Mayan rulers “embody time”?
INTRODUCTION
Week 1. The History of the Maya and the Aztec Civilizations
Both of these two books are introductory to the broader historical context of Maya and Aztec civilizations. The selected chapters present some of the basic historical, geographical, and demographics facts/claims about the Maya and the Aztecs. These texts also introduce some relevant information about the language, writing systems, and foundational myths of both the Maya and the Aztecs. The purpose of this session is to discuss these topics to gain acquaintance with some of the peculiarities and problems of ancient Mesoamerican thought.
Study Questions
Week 2. Introduction to Nahua thought
Further Reading
Study Questions
Week 3. Introduction to Mayan Thought
Study Questions
NAHUA PHILOSOPHY
Week 4. The Nahua conception of human beings
How did Nahuatl thought conceive the nature of human beings? León-Portilla’s chapter will serve as an introduction to this question. This chapter introduces key concepts in the Nahua conception of human beings. Firstly, it introduces the idea that human beings are created out of necessity by the gods, and the idea that they find themselves in a precarious situation. It also introduces the concepts of heart (yóllotl) and face (ix-tli) as the key concepts to understand human being’s dynamic nature. While the face can be understood as that which makes each person an individual and that which needs to be developed (we can assimilate it to a notion of the self), the heart is taken to be the dynamic center of human being’s psychological life. The chapter also focuses on the destiny of human beings on earth and in the afterlife, as well as to the notion of free will that is at play. In parallel to León-Portilla’s text and as the primary sources for this week are two Nahua Cantares or “ghost songs” that talk about the precarious nature of human beings on earth. These cantares exemplify some of the ideas discussed by León-Portilla. As further reading, the sections “Psychological well-being or in ixtli – in yollotl”, “Teachers of knowledge and face”, “Illness and the community”, and “Aztec healers or psychotherapists” provide a clear and helpful discussion on these concepts and, more generally, on Nahua psychology.
Study Questions
Week 5. Body and vital forces
Alfredo López Austin discusses the Aztec view of the body and the soul. According to him, the body was thought to be composed of two types of substances distinguished in virtue of their material features. Further, there was a substance that can be associated with the modern concept of souls. López Austin proposes that ancient Nahuas thought of human psychological life as having a tripartite structure, distinguishing between three animistic entities: tonalli, teyolia, and ihíyotl. Tonalli is associated with warmth and the radiation of heat, and seen as a force that animates an individual. Although it is mainly located in the head, it is also distributed across the entire body. Teyolía, in turn, is the animistic entity or force that is thought to abandon the body after death. There is a strong associated between teyolia and winged creatures, particularly birds, into which the human soul turned to travel to the afterlife world. This force is associated with the heart to which cognitive, affective, and volitive functions are attributed. Finally, ihiyotl is a force or gas thought to be located in the liver, but can also be introduced into the individual or occasionally emanate from them. This force is associated with some negative emotions and attitudes (e.g. greed and anger). As in other respects, Nahuatl medicine emphasized the relevance of keeping this force and its emanations in balance.
The proposed passage of the Florentine Codex As further illustrates the association between passing away and transforming into a bird. The further passages from the Florentine Codex are related to pure life and the knowledge of an individual. These passages are typically seen as sources which illuminate the Nahuatl concept of the heart.
As further reading, we suggest the paper by Olko & Madaczak, in which they critically discuss López Austin’s proposal. They suggest that we should consider tonalli as the animistic entity that was most likely to be present in pre-Hispanic thought.
Alfredo López Austin discusses the Aztec view of the body and the soul. According to him, the body was thought to be composed of two types of substances distinguished in virtue of their material features. Further, there was a substance that can be associated with the modern concept of souls. López Austin proposes that ancient Nahuas thought of human psychological life as having a tripartite structure, distinguishing between three animistic entities: tonalli, teyolia, and ihíyotl. Tonalli is associated with warmth and the radiation of heat, and seen as a force that animates an individual. Although it is mainly located in the head, it is also distributed across the entire body. Teyolía, in turn, is the animistic entity or force that is thought to abandon the body after death. There is a strong associated between teyolia and winged creatures, particularly birds, into which the human soul turned to travel to the afterlife world. This force is associated with the heart to which cognitive, affective, and volitive functions are attributed. Finally, ihiyotl is a force or gas thought to be located in the liver, but can also be introduced into the individual or occasionally emanate from them. This force is associated with some negative emotions and attitudes (e.g. greed and anger). As in other respects, Nahuatl medicine emphasized the relevance of keeping this force and its emanations in balance.
The proposed passage of the Florentine Codex As further illustrates the association between passing away and transforming into a bird. The further passages from the Florentine Codex are related to pure life and the knowledge of an individual. These passages are typically seen as sources which illuminate the Nahuatl concept of the heart.
As further reading, we suggest the paper by Olko & Madaczak, in which they critically discuss López Austin’s proposal. They suggest that we should consider tonalli as the animistic entity that was most likely to be present in pre-Hispanic thought.
Study Questions
Week 6. Perception and the senses
What is the Nahua conception of perception? And how does this relate to pictorial expression? This is the theme that guides these readings. The proposed reading is the paper “Sensorial Experiences in Mesoamerica” by Sarah E. Newman. In this paper, Newman begins by discussing the methodological challenges of understanding the experiences of ancient cultures. One of the ideas she emphasizes from precious scholarship is the claim that perception is not seen as passive and was taken to be the centre of consciousness. Newman goes through each of the five senses, noting the relevance of multi-modality for Nahua understanding of perceptual experience.
To link this theme to that of understanding and communication, a paper on the senses in Mesoamerican cultures has been proposed as further reading. One of the guiding ideas of the paper by Houston & Taube (2000) is that the Mesoamerican conception of perception is synesthetic insofar as their material culture aimed at evoking multi-modal experiences. According to the authors, writing was meant to be accompanied by oral expression.
To explore this idea, it is suggested to read some sections of the paper “Aztec Pictorial Narratives” by Isabel Laack which analyses the embodied metaphors found in the pictorial manuscript Mapa de Cuauhtinchan no. 2 (the map of Cuauhtinchan number 2) based on the theory of embodied cognition proposed by Lakoff and Johnson. According to the latter, our concepts are grounded on embodied metaphors. Laack’s proposal is that Aztec pictographic manuscript exploits these kinds of concepts to enable the communication of non-propositional meaning.
What is the Nahua conception of perception? And how does this relate to pictorial expression? This is the theme that guides these readings. The proposed reading is the paper “Sensorial Experiences in Mesoamerica” by Sarah E. Newman. In this paper, Newman begins by discussing the methodological challenges of understanding the experiences of ancient cultures. One of the ideas she emphasizes from precious scholarship is the claim that perception is not seen as passive and was taken to be the centre of consciousness. Newman goes through each of the five senses, noting the relevance of multi-modality for Nahua understanding of perceptual experience.
To link this theme to that of understanding and communication, a paper on the senses in Mesoamerican cultures has been proposed as further reading. One of the guiding ideas of the paper by Houston & Taube (2000) is that the Mesoamerican conception of perception is synesthetic insofar as their material culture aimed at evoking multi-modal experiences. According to the authors, writing was meant to be accompanied by oral expression.
To explore this idea, it is suggested to read some sections of the paper “Aztec Pictorial Narratives” by Isabel Laack which analyses the embodied metaphors found in the pictorial manuscript Mapa de Cuauhtinchan no. 2 (the map of Cuauhtinchan number 2) based on the theory of embodied cognition proposed by Lakoff and Johnson. According to the latter, our concepts are grounded on embodied metaphors. Laack’s proposal is that Aztec pictographic manuscript exploits these kinds of concepts to enable the communication of non-propositional meaning.
Study Questions
MAYAN PHILOSOPHY
Week 7. The Mayan conception of the soul
What is the Mayan conception of human beings, their vital force, and their place in the universe? To address these topics, this session includes the reading of a section of the Popol Vuh, that tells the story of the Quiché people, a Mayan group in Guatemala, starting off from the creation. This story was kept through oral narration and was recorded in writing in the sixteenth century. The sections recommended for review focus on the creation of human beings, the several attempts at creating humans, how they were finally created perfect and how they were later changed so as not to be as gods. To accompany the reading of the Popol Vuh, a section of chapter 2 of the book Maya Cosmos has also been recommended. Here, Freidel, Schele & Parker (1995) contextualize the creation of human beings in the wider context of the Quiché creation myth.
To further into the question about the Mayan conception of human beings, we have also recommended the first part of chapter 4 of Maya Cosmos. Here, the authors introduce the reader to the Mayan notion of k’ul (ch’ul), essence or vital force. As the authors note, k’ul is used to denote a sacred aspect of human that is not identical with their bodies but is inserted into them. According to some conceptions, however, this vital force, however, is not unique to human beings but has some kind of universality. The authors also discuss the notion of chanul (also kanul) which is a supernatural guardian that accompanies a person and shares with them their vital force. As a third concept of soul, the authors discuss the notion of the ‘white flower’ and the idea that the soul is created and abandons the body in the moment of death. Finally, to discuss the materiality of the soul, the authors introduce the K’awil, a god that “symbolizes the embodiment of spiritual force in material objects”. It is also suggested to take a look at the suggested pages of Houston’s The Life Within to see some pictorial representations of k’uh.
As further reading, the section ‘Terms of embodiment’ of the introduction to Embodied Lives by Meskell & Joyce has been suggested. In this section, the authors discuss the materiality of the Mayan conception of human beings.
What is the Mayan conception of human beings, their vital force, and their place in the universe? To address these topics, this session includes the reading of a section of the Popol Vuh, that tells the story of the Quiché people, a Mayan group in Guatemala, starting off from the creation. This story was kept through oral narration and was recorded in writing in the sixteenth century. The sections recommended for review focus on the creation of human beings, the several attempts at creating humans, how they were finally created perfect and how they were later changed so as not to be as gods. To accompany the reading of the Popol Vuh, a section of chapter 2 of the book Maya Cosmos has also been recommended. Here, Freidel, Schele & Parker (1995) contextualize the creation of human beings in the wider context of the Quiché creation myth.
To further into the question about the Mayan conception of human beings, we have also recommended the first part of chapter 4 of Maya Cosmos. Here, the authors introduce the reader to the Mayan notion of k’ul (ch’ul), essence or vital force. As the authors note, k’ul is used to denote a sacred aspect of human that is not identical with their bodies but is inserted into them. According to some conceptions, however, this vital force, however, is not unique to human beings but has some kind of universality. The authors also discuss the notion of chanul (also kanul) which is a supernatural guardian that accompanies a person and shares with them their vital force. As a third concept of soul, the authors discuss the notion of the ‘white flower’ and the idea that the soul is created and abandons the body in the moment of death. Finally, to discuss the materiality of the soul, the authors introduce the K’awil, a god that “symbolizes the embodiment of spiritual force in material objects”. It is also suggested to take a look at the suggested pages of Houston’s The Life Within to see some pictorial representations of k’uh.
As further reading, the section ‘Terms of embodiment’ of the introduction to Embodied Lives by Meskell & Joyce has been suggested. In this section, the authors discuss the materiality of the Mayan conception of human beings.
Further reading
Study Questions
Week 8. Personhood
McLeod begins by asking whether, for ancient Mayans, the name of rulers or gods is a case of proper names or of function names, i.e. a description of a role. He is interested in a Mayan view discussed in previous chapters according to which the attributes of e.g. an exemplary ruler are attached to the role they fulfilled. For McLeod, the Mayan view is partly supported by their metaphysical views on the self. As preamble to his discussion of the Mayan notion of personhood, McLeod provides some comparison between the Mayan view of the self to that of other traditions. He refers, too, to the sacrality of objects discussed in the previous session. McLeod, then, moves on to discuss the ideas that Mayan personhood can be collective and that someone’s essence can extend to material artifacts. The text also includes a discussion of the Mayan notion of substitution (k’ex), the act in which someone took the essence of a god.
In light of McLeod’s remarks on the relevance of performance for Mayan understanding of personhood and substitution, it is worth considering here that the Popol Vuh was orally transmitted. It is also worth reading the prayer recommended by Andrés Xiloj Peruch to Dennis Tedlock when he was working on the translation of the Popol Vuh.
As further reading, it is also suggested to review the short paper by Evon Vogt where he discusses the concept of souls of the Mayan people from Zinacanteco, a municipality in Chiapas, Mexico. It might also be interesting to compare McLeod’s view with Gillespie’s.
McLeod begins by asking whether, for ancient Mayans, the name of rulers or gods is a case of proper names or of function names, i.e. a description of a role. He is interested in a Mayan view discussed in previous chapters according to which the attributes of e.g. an exemplary ruler are attached to the role they fulfilled. For McLeod, the Mayan view is partly supported by their metaphysical views on the self. As preamble to his discussion of the Mayan notion of personhood, McLeod provides some comparison between the Mayan view of the self to that of other traditions. He refers, too, to the sacrality of objects discussed in the previous session. McLeod, then, moves on to discuss the ideas that Mayan personhood can be collective and that someone’s essence can extend to material artifacts. The text also includes a discussion of the Mayan notion of substitution (k’ex), the act in which someone took the essence of a god.
In light of McLeod’s remarks on the relevance of performance for Mayan understanding of personhood and substitution, it is worth considering here that the Popol Vuh was orally transmitted. It is also worth reading the prayer recommended by Andrés Xiloj Peruch to Dennis Tedlock when he was working on the translation of the Popol Vuh.
As further reading, it is also suggested to review the short paper by Evon Vogt where he discusses the concept of souls of the Mayan people from Zinacanteco, a municipality in Chiapas, Mexico. It might also be interesting to compare McLeod’s view with Gillespie’s.
Study Questions
Week 9. Mayan experience of time
What is the Mayan conception of time and of the experience of time? To illustrate the Mayan conception of time as cyclical, it is suggested to read some sections of the introduction the Chilam Balam of Tizimin edited and translated by Munro S. Edmonson. As explained here by Edmonson, the Chilam Balam constitute a set of books that have been shaped over centuries by Yucatecan Maya people. According to Edmonson, the Chilam Balam of Tizimin is the most historical of the books. It contains the history of Yucatan, Mexico, from the seventh to the nineteenth century, covering each katun (k’atun) or period of approx. 20 years. The task of recording each katun and predicting upcoming events fell on the shoulders of priests. As an introduction, Edmonson begins by explaining the Mayan view of history as cyclical and predictable. He also provides a summary of the history told by this book.
While it has been typically argued that the Mayan view of time is cyclical, the suggested paper by Markus Eberl puts pressure to this view. His aim is to change the focus from the conception of time to the experience of time. To this end, Eberl draws on the phenomenological views of Edmund Husserl and Merleau-Ponty to argue that Mayan perception of time is experienced spatially.
As further reading, it is suggested to review the sections ‘Time as a construct of human-nature cooperation’ and ‘Calendars and ordering’ in McLeod’s Philosophy of the Ancient Maya. Here, McLeod discusses the sense in which time was, for Ancient Mayans, both a human and a natural phenomenon. He also discusses the idea that the ordering of time has a crucial political component.
What is the Mayan conception of time and of the experience of time? To illustrate the Mayan conception of time as cyclical, it is suggested to read some sections of the introduction the Chilam Balam of Tizimin edited and translated by Munro S. Edmonson. As explained here by Edmonson, the Chilam Balam constitute a set of books that have been shaped over centuries by Yucatecan Maya people. According to Edmonson, the Chilam Balam of Tizimin is the most historical of the books. It contains the history of Yucatan, Mexico, from the seventh to the nineteenth century, covering each katun (k’atun) or period of approx. 20 years. The task of recording each katun and predicting upcoming events fell on the shoulders of priests. As an introduction, Edmonson begins by explaining the Mayan view of history as cyclical and predictable. He also provides a summary of the history told by this book.
While it has been typically argued that the Mayan view of time is cyclical, the suggested paper by Markus Eberl puts pressure to this view. His aim is to change the focus from the conception of time to the experience of time. To this end, Eberl draws on the phenomenological views of Edmund Husserl and Merleau-Ponty to argue that Mayan perception of time is experienced spatially.
As further reading, it is suggested to review the sections ‘Time as a construct of human-nature cooperation’ and ‘Calendars and ordering’ in McLeod’s Philosophy of the Ancient Maya. Here, McLeod discusses the sense in which time was, for Ancient Mayans, both a human and a natural phenomenon. He also discusses the idea that the ordering of time has a crucial political component.
Further reading
Comment: In this chapter, Maffie compares the general framework of Western philosophy and that of Mexica or Aztec philosophy. The latter offers a genuine alternative to the former, for Mexica’s philosophy, in general, is “path-seeking” rather than “truth-seeking”. This means that the main purpose of philosophy consists in following and expanding a particular way of life. The author also introduces some important features of Mexica philosophy, namely, that there is no clear-cut distinction between philosophy, religion, and spirituality. Furthermore, in this chapter we can also find a brief account of some interesting philosophical views. Firstly, the relationship between living beings and Mexica Deities (i.e., Creator Beings). The latter are not transcendent, and they have no ontological priority over the former insofar as the existence of both are deeply intertwined. Secondly, the author discusses the moral obligations of human beings towards Creator Beings, non-human animals, and other human beings. Finally, it discusses the Mexica notion of “personhood” (i.e., admits degrees and can belong to inanimate objects, and both human and non-human animals).